24 Nigerian-born Female Students Released After Eight Days Post Abduction
-
- By Matthew Mcguire
- 11 Mar 2026
This is slightly uncomfortable to admit, but I'll say it. Several books wait by my bed, each incompletely consumed. Inside my phone, I'm partway through 36 audio novels, which pales next to the nearly fifty ebooks I've left unfinished on my Kindle. That fails to account for the increasing collection of pre-release copies next to my living room table, competing for endorsements, now that I am a professional writer in my own right.
Initially, these stats might appear to support contemporary comments about today's focus. An author noted recently how easy it is to lose a individual's attention when it is divided by digital platforms and the constant updates. They stated: “Perhaps as readers' focus periods change the writing will have to adapt with them.” Yet as an individual who previously would persistently complete every book I started, I now regard it a individual choice to put down a novel that I'm not enjoying.
I wouldn't think that this tendency is due to a limited concentration – rather more it comes from the feeling of existence moving swiftly. I've consistently been impressed by the monastic principle: “Keep the end daily in view.” A different idea that we each have a mere finite period on this world was as sobering to me as to everyone. But at what different point in human history have we ever had such immediate availability to so many incredible creative works, whenever we want? A wealth of riches meets me in any library and behind every digital platform, and I want to be intentional about where I focus my time. Could “not finishing” a novel (term in the publishing industry for Incomplete) be rather than a sign of a weak mind, but a thoughtful one?
Especially at a era when book production (and thus, acquisition) is still led by a specific group and its quandaries. Even though exploring about characters unlike our own lives can help to build the capacity for compassion, we furthermore select stories to consider our own experiences and role in the world. Until the works on the displays more accurately reflect the experiences, lives and interests of potential readers, it might be extremely difficult to hold their attention.
Of course, some writers are successfully writing for the “modern interest”: the concise prose of some current novels, the focused fragments of additional writers, and the short chapters of numerous modern stories are all a wonderful showcase for a shorter style and technique. And there is an abundance of craft guidance geared toward capturing a audience: refine that initial phrase, improve that start, increase the stakes (higher! higher!) and, if writing thriller, put a mystery on the opening. Such advice is all good – a prospective representative, editor or audience will devote only a several valuable seconds determining whether or not to forge ahead. It is little reason in being contrary, like the writer on a workshop I participated in who, when challenged about the plot of their book, announced that “everything makes sense about three-quarters of the into the story”. No novelist should subject their audience through a series of 12 labours in order to be grasped.
But I do create to be understood, as far as that is achievable. On occasion that demands leading the consumer's interest, directing them through the narrative step by economical step. Sometimes, I've discovered, comprehension requires perseverance – and I must grant me (as well as other creators) the freedom of exploring, of building, of deviating, until I find something meaningful. An influential thinker makes the case for the story finding innovative patterns and that, instead of the standard dramatic arc, “other patterns might enable us envision innovative approaches to create our stories alive and authentic, persist in creating our novels novel”.
Accordingly, the two opinions align – the novel may have to evolve to suit the modern consumer, as it has continually achieved since it originated in the historical period (as we know it currently). It could be, like past writers, tomorrow's creators will return to serialising their books in publications. The future these creators may even now be publishing their work, section by section, on digital services including those accessed by countless of regular users. Art forms shift with the period and we should permit them.
Yet we should not claim that any evolutions are completely because of shorter concentration. If that was so, brief fiction collections and micro tales would be considered much more {commercial|profitable|marketable
A seasoned software engineer with a passion for open-source projects and tech education.